even an old HD4670 has 20-50% better performance.) But the GPU portion aside, the CPU portion of these APUs were never great performers, regardless of whether you got the "2-core" or "4-core" variants. Though also compared to just about any stand-alone cheap GPU of the time (when GPU prices weren't insane), they were often out-classed too (e.g. At least compared to Intel's integrated solutions at the time, these were light years ahead. and overall, they did OK back when they came out. I'm not that well-versed in the AMD APUs either, but from my limited experience with A4 APUs and what I've read online, the entire lineup of the AMD APUs were targeted towards the lowest-budget gaming sector. If I can make a decent performer of this, I have a home for it. Is the A10-6800K 4.1GHz any better (same core apparently)? I am not really up to speed on the A-series from AMD.it's the fastest the board can take.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |